![]() ![]() Actually just move the infobox image down to the 1st game's section would be best I think. Bananasoldier ( talk) 22:35, 1 January 2014 (UTC) Reply Yeah a logo of some kind would be good for the infobox. It might be hard to acquire screenshots for the original version, given that Ninja Kiwi's probably taken the game down. I'll see what I can do for 4 & 5 screenshots. We should change the infobox image, as well, because it seems a little outdated. Then it would be unbalanced, and we'd need logos for 1 and 2, and then there'd be images all over the place. Thoughts? Samwalton9 ( talk) 20:01, 1 January 2014 (UTC) Reply I can agree on removing logo pictures because if we kept them, we'd need a logo picture for Bloons TD 5. Some gameplay images are definitely needed and won't be hard to include, but I'm considering removing the logo pictures as I don't think they serve any purpose. move article focus away from elaborate gameplay detail to key features that differ between gamesīananasoldier ( talk) 07:22, 31 December 2013 (UTC) Reply.Hope this helps! ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 00:59, 31 December 2013 (UTC)" This list provides a comprehensive list of commonly accepted sources, along with custom Google searches set up so your search only returns results from the listed websites. For reliable sources related to video gaming, Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Sources provides more information than you could ever want about video game sourcing. Also, question: I believe the article should be moved to Bloons TD, since the series seems to have been renamed? Unless I'm missing something. I'd look at the Grand Theft Auto' reception section as a good example we can provide an overall impression of the entire series, then get into game-specific ratings (with a table?). It's complicated since it's going to cover the entire series. I think the next best place to look at is the reception section, since it only mentions a couple of games right now. Focusing on the key features and biggest changes between each game (graphics, game modes, new features, etc.) are the most important. Excessive gameplay detail isn't desirable for an encyclopedia, such as lists of all the types of towers, bloon colors, etc. "Overall coverage of each game looks good, but I also think it's a bit long. It was really useful to me, so I'm sharing it here: I asked SuperHamster for his advice/opinion on the article in its current state. Thanks! Walkop ( talk) 22:45, 14 July 2011 (UTC) Reply I'll try to help in more factual objective ways. Thank you for giving your perspective and for your correction. I was actually thinking similarly, but this article is a bit low on information and I hadn't really gotten around to it yet. ![]() Edits) 16:23, 14 July 2011 (UTC) Reply Of course I understand.Some development information from interviews or something would be more helpful then minor gameplay features. Just remember, Wikipedia covers things on a real world perspective. The information included in the table should be in the sections for each game, and/or the lead. Also the table you inserted was unnecessary. Listing all the types of bloons, towers, levels, etc. ![]() Walkop ( talk) 02:03, 14 July 2011 (UTC) Reply Just letting you know, Wikipedia is not a gameguide. but even that is low on factual, direct information and isn't really relevant to gameplay. Anyone willing to help out? I've done a bit, added a table for version availability etc. The article seems a bit low on actual information about the game and the specific variations on each edition. Guess I beat you guys to it.FlashingYoshi! 18:13, 20 June 2011 (UTC) - Preceding unsigned comment added by FlashingYoshi ( talk Bloons - Black60dragon 19:13, 11 June 2011 (UTC) Reply.So we make a bloons page on its own and how about I go ahead and make a subpage and give you guys the link and everyone could work on it so it gets down fast and right. I think Bloons should get its own article, but Bloons TD should not redirect there because it is already a longish article. I agree that Bloons should get an article, especially if Bloons TD gets an article. I was going to suggest this, but it looks like someone beat me to it. ![]() We need to make this page about all of them Bloons, bloons td and spinoffs and change the name to Bloons and redirect Bloons TD to here I'll work on that in my sandbox and switch them if you want me to Black60dragon ( talk) 23:47, 27 April 2011 (UTC) Reply Instead of automatically redirecting to the Bloons TD page I think there should be a page about the Bloons brand, such as the actual game Bloons and not the spinoff Bloons Tower Defense. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |